shaw gibbs - accountants and business advisers
accountants & business advisers

Article

Pop group ABBA have been downgraded and are now touring as AC/DC

Article

Pop group ABBA have been downgraded and are now touring as AC/DC

28 Aug 2020

3 minute read

Having stepped back from the weekly ramblings from the isolation of a home office, the recent exams fiasco rekindled my love of a good mental ramble.

Pop group ABBA have been downgraded and are now touring as AC/DC - news article image

Having stepped back from the weekly ramblings from the isolation of a home office, the recent exams fiasco rekindled my love of a good mental ramble.

As the father of an 18 year old waiting for A-level results during a pandemic, results day and the following fiasco were far from funny. Since then I have read more maths than at any time since I left school and have upskilled my statistics knowledge immensely. In amongst all the data, one thing that became very apparent was that there was a dislocation between the outcome that students, schools and parents thought the system was due to produce and the outcome which the designers of the algorithm were asked to produce.

Reading the detailed Ofqual publications, and the easier to understand analysis by statisticians, actuaries and economists who were far better placed to understand some of it than I, the difference between what schools were asked to do and what the standardisation model was designed to do were miles apart.

Schools were given masses of guidance on what evidence to look for on individuals in order to best estimate their likely performance in an exam. The algorithm looked to remove individualistic elements in favour of historically equivalent national based grade allocations. Not even as close as chalk and cheese.

Ofqual was effectively asked to produce a question to fit the answer they had been given. Schools had been given the questions to ask and were expected to come up with an answer.

One of the really important things which this demonstrates with any form of planning is ensuring that everybody involved is aware of the objectives, of what the planning is supposed to deliver, of what success looks like and what is expected of them as their part in the planning.

As financial planners it is very easy for us to “do an Ofqual”. To assume that we know the answer and look to design the plan to provide the answer that we have decided on. This could be based on what other clients have wanted; it could be based on theoretical models; it could be based on what other planners are doing; it could even be based on ourselves, our own objectives and biases.

Take a simple question such as “how much should I keep in cash for emergencies”. A trainer on a course might suggest X months’ expenditure to fit with how many months before an Income Protection policy started to pay out if you were too ill to work; personally we might be happy to have enough for a couple of months’ mortgage payments plus the cost of a new boiler; most of our other clients may think £10,000 is a nice round figure to keep aside; other planners may warn against holding “too much cash”, especially when interest rates are low.

The answer is quite probably none of these, but as financial planners we could easily deliver one of these as a standardised answer. The danger then is that when something happened, either personally or in the wider world, which caused you to need to be sure you had enough cash not to worry about it, if you’d effectively been downgraded then the comfort and security that you needed wouldn’t be there.

So we need to know that our clients feel able to tell us what they want to achieve and we need to always remember that our job is not to standardise our clients’ objectives but to gather all the evidence to enable us to describe those objectives and fit the plan to them rather than them to the plan.

Author:

Ed Gibson

Need expert advice?

Speak to an expert for advice on
+44-1865 292200 or get in touch online to find out how Shaw Gibbs can help you

Email
info@shawgibbs.com

Author:

Ed Gibson

Need expert advice?

Speak to an expert for advice on
+44-1865 292200 or get in touch online to find out how Shaw Gibbs can help you

Email
info@shawgibbs.com

What our clients say

  • I have been a client of Shaw Gibbs since the 1960's and have always found a professional but friendly response from the partners or staff

    I have been a client of Shaw Gibbs since the 1960's and have always found a professional but friendly response from the partners or staff

    Richard Preston

  • Thank you for being such a great partner in building our business!

    Thank you for being such a great partner in building our business!

    Oege de Moor - CEO, Semmle

  • Experience, expertise and support was not only invaluable from a financing perspective, but also in assisting us to determine the future strategy.

    Experience, expertise and support was not only invaluable from a financing perspective, but also in assisting us to determine the future strategy.

    Charles Parry – John Parry Estates Ltd

  • Shaw Gibbs’ service provides timely expertise at a reasonable cost

    Shaw Gibbs’ service provides timely expertise at a reasonable cost

    OATS Limited

© 2023 Shaw Gibbs Ltd

Your registration